Dialoguing of the Transgender and Pro-Abortion Arguments to Find the Truth

The dialogue presented here, between a transgender leftist and a man educated in natural theory and modern science, is as rare as hen’s teeth.

Leftists usually explode into psychotic rage when their ideas and arguments are questioned.

But not in this case.

Both sides of the arguments presented here are prodded and probed and tickled by the respective protagonists.

Whatever side of the argument you take, do you see any points that were missed or poorly presented by the two men?

Regrettably, the title of the video is a bit aggressive but don’t be discouraged.

For your viewing pleasure, an argument between two diametrically opposing views,  fashioned like an art piece:

 

 

NOAA Scientist Blows Whistle On Global Warming Hoax

“A high-level whistleblower has told this newspaper that America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) breached its own rules on scientific integrity when it published the sensational but flawed report, aimed at making the maximum possible impact on world leaders including Barack Obama and David Cameron at the UN climate conference in Paris in 2015.”

climate-change-hoax

The UN and NOAA hoaxers tried to use the UN climate report to make a nearly 20 year period of stable weather disappear.

“The report claimed that the ‘pause’ or ‘slowdown’ in global warming in the period since 1998 – revealed by UN scientists in 2013 – never existed, and that world temperatures had been rising faster than scientists expected.”

What is truly strange and of great concern is how many seemingly intelligent people swallow government hoaxes so easily and so totally.

US Catholic Bishops Publically Shame President Trump Today At Church

A contents of a letter from the US Catholic Bishops was deep throated into the gullets of the Catholic laity today at church.  In the letter, US Catholic Bishops shamed President Trump and his supporters for his executive order which seeks to delay refugee and immigrant admission into the United States.

newman1

Here are the contents of the letter:

“We strongly disagree with the Executive Order’s halting refugee admissions. We believe that now more than ever, welcoming newcomers and refugees is an act of love and hope. We will continue to engage the new administration, as we have all administrations for the duration of the current refugee program, now almost forty years. We will work vigorously to ensure that refugees are humanely welcomed in collaboration with Catholic Charities without sacrificing our security or our core values as Americans, and to ensure that families may be reunified with their loved ones.”

“The United States has long provided leadership in resettling refugees. We believe in assisting all those who are vulnerable and fleeing persecution, regardless of their religion. This includes Christians, as well as Yazidis and Shia Muslims from Syria, Rohingyas from Burma, and other religious minorities. However, we need to protect all our brothers and sisters of all faiths, including Muslims, who have lost family, home, and country. They are children of God and are entitled to be treated with human dignity. We believe that by helping to resettle the most vulnerable, we are living out our Christian faith as Jesus has challenged us to do.”

“Today, more than 65 million people around the world are forcibly displaced from their homes. Given this extraordinary level of suffering, the U.S. Catholic Bishops will redouble their support for, and efforts to protect, all who flee persecution and violence, as just one part of the perennial and global work of the Church in this area of concern.”

President Trump’s executive order is for a delay of 120 days, not a “halting” of refugee admissions.

That Catholic Bishops feel they have to not only interfere with the policies of a duly elected US President, but to outright lie about his intentions is beyond stunning.

Most of the people at my church voted for President Trump and after the letter was read there was nothing but stone cold, bitter silence.

Trump Immigration Ban a Lesson in Divided Government

Today, news headlines read something like, “Federal Court Halts Trump’s Immigration Ban,” or “Judges Block Parts of Trump’s Order of Muslim Immigration.”

Here we have a very public conflict between Trump’s executive branch of government and the unaccountable judicial branch of government which for the last century has been allowed to run hog wild.

President Trump issues an order executing immigration law and a judge jumps in on behalf of those immigrants affected by the executive order, effectively acting as a check on executive power.

trump-immigration-ban

What is THE Donald to do?

First, let’s review a little basic political science brought to American government by its Founding Fathers who, regarding the separation of powers, were the brain children of Enlightenment political philosopher, Charles de Montesquieu (a Frenchie of all things!).

America’s Founding Fathers via the Constitution, designed and built a government whose powers to govern were institutionally separated into their constituent parts:

  1. The power to create rules (legislative branch)
  2. The power to enforce the rules (executive branch)
  3. The power to interpret the rules (judicial branch)

The powers of government were separated to allow people to be free of government tyranny so that The People could govern themselves and become masters of their own lives.

The relevant situation is that President Trump has enforced rules created by Congress (the legislative branch); and a judge (a member of the judicial branch) has stepped in on behalf of those affected by the enforcement of those rules. The judge’s objective: to check the enforcement and rule making powers of the executive and legislative branches of government.

But President Trump responded to the judicial branch check by simply ignoring it. This is a rare example of the executive branch turning right around and counter-checking judicial branch power.

customs-agents

So what happens now?

President Trump, the leader of the executive branch was duly elected by The People and is accountable to them.

The judicial branch was established specifically NOT to be subject to the will of The People so as to be a truly independent source of legal judgment.

So that leaves The People as the check on President Trump with his decision to ignore a judge’s order.

So the question is, in this situation, which branch of government is acting in accordance with the rule of law?

The answer may not be obvious.

 

National Unity Lost In Translation

The following is a foreign language dictionary of common terms for Americans visiting or living in, the Clinton Archipelago.*

clinton-archipelago

1) “Peaceful Protest” – No leftists were hurt while throwing bricks through windows, demanding “Death to the pigs” or getting together in large gangs to waylay small, lone counter protesters from behind.

2) “Voter Suppression” — Cutting into Democrat vote totals by taking any steps to prevent voter fraud like requiring a photo ID at the polling place.

3) “The Constitution” – An outdated, irrelevant document that should be ignored unless you are claiming that some liberal agenda item is guaranteed by it despite the fact that no one noticed it for 200 years.

4) “Fascist” — People who want to cut spending, abide by the Constitution and get the government off your back.

5) “We want the government out of our bedrooms” – We want the government out of our bedrooms…right after they force the Pope to buy us birth control and promise to support our children if we decide not to use the IUD suggested by the Pope because, “Who does that guy think he is, right?”

6) “Greedy” — People who want to keep money they’ve earned instead of giving it to people who don’t work as hard, but do vote for Democrats.

7) “Sexism” – Disagreeing with Hillary Clinton, opposing the abortion of female babies or being against mentally ill men being allowed to use the bathroom with women.

8) “Radical position” – Relatively popular non-liberal positions that have been around as long as anyone can remember — that liberals have recently decided to oppose almost entirely to make themselves appear more sensitive. Example: Refusing to change the name of the Redskins or believing you can’t change genders via surgery is a radical position.

9) “Angry, white male” – A white guy who votes Republican.

10) “Anti-intellectual” – Those who refuse to acknowledge that liberal college professors who couldn’t cut it outside of a university or MSNBC are right about everything.

11) “Racist” — Those who believe that people should be judged by the content of their character, not the color of their skin and those who believe in enforcing the immigration laws that are already on the books.

12) “Climate change denier” — Someone who actually judges global warming based on the available scientific evidence instead of coming up with a socialistic agenda first and then passing out grant money to any scientists who are willing to attempt to justify it.

13) “Bipartisanship” – When Republicans cooperate with Democrats to push their radical leftist agenda. Not to be confused with “selling out” which happens when Democrats cooperate with Republicans to push their agenda.

14) “Heartless” – Supporting programs based on whether they work and are good for the country instead of selecting programs to back based on how good they make you feel about yourself.

15) “Open Minded” – Mindlessly agreeing with Nancy Pelosi and Michael Moore 100% on every issue.

16) “A Courageous Speech” — When one leftist gives a self-congratulatory speech to another group of leftists that restates things they all believe.

17) “The American Flag” — A symbol of oppression waved by ignorant, bucktoothed hillbillies dumb enough to think that this is a great place to live.

18) “Guns” — The cause of all crime.

19) “Jesus” — Someone who is completely irrelevant to any and all political matters unless you’re claiming He would definitely support gay marriage or abortion.

20) “Hands up, don’t shoot” –The police shouldn’t be allowed to shoot people with their hands up or people pointing toy guns at them or people trying to kill them or pretty much anybody, for any reason.

*Hawks, John. Liberal Translation Guide: 20 Translations of Things Liberals Say. http://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2017/01/21/the-liberal-translation-guide-20-translations-of-things-that-liberals-say-n2274756

Why Atheism Is So Deadly to the Individual and to Society

Atheism is so deadly to the individual because it strands him in time and head space.

Atheism is so deadly to society because an atheist society is composed by people who are stranded in time and head space.

Credit for the particular philosophical malady affecting atheists goes to none other than good Friar William of Ockham (born around 1280 Anno Domini in Ockham, England). He was a Catholic priest and heretic who is famous in modern times as the author of “Ockham’s Razor.”

guillermo-de-ockham

Friar William Ockham’s teachings were so radical that he was finally forced to go on the lam to escape Catholic Church Inquisitors. He is thought to have died in Munich, Germany circa 1349 Anno Domini.

Were he alive today, Friar William of Ockham might be known as a “constructivist.” That is, what we learn does not come from developing an understanding of objective reality, but from what we conceptually construct about our own experiences in our own minds.

In other words, reality and what we think we know is whatever we define it to be. What’s wrong with this picture?

alfred-e-headroomThe constructed individual has his own personal Max Headroom for a mind, a non-stop, chattering of unadulterated bias.

Just think of it!

The constructed individual hasn’t a snow ball’s chance in hell of escaping a destiny guided by pure stupidity.  For stupidity is the natural state of man. Unlike all other creatures, man has to be taught everything. How can a creature whose natural state is stupidity, teach himself anything?

Further, stupidity, always at odds with objective reality, makes happiness impossible.

Just think of it!

These particular teachings of Friar William of Ockham are the accepted doctrine in today’s educational, political and media establishments. Ironically, our entire, nearly Godless, Western society sits on the shoulders of a Medieval Catholic heretic priest.

In the classroom, students are left to find their own way which leaves them sitting ducks for indoctrination.

In politics, The People, bereft of any understanding of “the Laws of Nature and Nature’s God,” are left intellectually disarmed. For they have nothing but their own personal bias to aid them in making sense of relentless, emotionally violent and confusing political campaigns.

And the media, far from informing the public and fostering human nature, becomes a vicious, remorseless tool of totalitarian statecraft.

In conclusion, we can reason out that atheism is deadly to the individual.

This is because the atheism provides the intellect with no objective foundation upon which to stand. It is therefore necessary for the individual to construct his own version of reality within his own solitary mind.

This leaves the human being in his natural state of stupidity. For all he knows is what little he was able to construct in his own mind, or what was fed to him by those who “taught” him. This  also means that personal bias is left to run amok since the power to think rationally was never developed.

More disturbing still is that the institutions fundamental to civil society, education, political and media, are all dedicated to the mass production of stupid people.

It is long past time to throw atheism and the teachings of Friar William of Ockham  onto the ash heap of history.

 

 

 

The Official, Infallible “All Atheists Are Marxists” Test

From cold, hard experience on social media it appears that atheists invariably are hard core Marxists (leftists).

Presented here is the Official, Infallible All Atheists are Marxists Test:

  1. Do you dislike or even hate Donald Trump?
  2. In the picture below what is Donald Trump saying?

donald-trump

Answer Key:

  1. If you are an atheist and answered “Yes” to question #1, the Official, Infallible “All Atheists are Marxists” Test has determined that you are a Marxist.
  2. Don’t answer that question, you potty mouthed Marxist!

The Tyranny of the Majority

It is said that a picture is worth a thousand words.

clinton-archipelago

Hillary Clinton won the popular vote in the 2016 presidential election, but the people who voted for her were clustered (re: cloistered) within very small geographical areas (1).

Donald Trump won in 2626 counties.

Hillary Clinton won in 487 counties (2).

Taking lessons in political philosophy from ancient Greeks like Socrates, Plato and Aristotle (all of whom had deep misgivings about pure majority rule), America’s Founding Fathers (namely Alexander Hamilton) instituted the Electoral College.

Why do people who live in mega-populated urban areas tend to hallucinate a Democrat Party-dominated organized crime syndicate called the Federal Government as something good?

  1. http://www.vividmaps.com/2016/12/trumpland-and-Clinton-archipelago.html
  2. http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/national_world/2016/12/06/1206-clinton-won-487-counties.html

Why Modern Science Heralds the Death of Atheism and the Rise of Christianity

Regardless of one’s own worldview, the election of political outsider Donald Trump as President of the United States clearly signaled the roaring back to life of Christianity in Western Civilization.

For it was the common Christian, downtrodden after a nearly 30 year horror show of the Bill Clinton,  George W. Bush and Barack Obama regimes who quietly and lawfully voted to pull the plug on the whole blasted mess.

Because of the nature of Christianity, it is easy to predict a  roaring back to life of economic opportunity and prosperity, traditional moral values, and a bountiful cornucopia of technological development and scientific discovery and the death of atheism (the sand in the gears of all human well being).

For the modern Christian worldview, born of the 18th century Enlightenment, holds that the world and all that is in it, is subject to “the Laws of Nature and Nature’s God(1).”

Such a worldview provides a most fertile environment for not only healthy moral values and just politics, but also for technological and scientific development. This is because science and technology are themselves, the study and implementation of natural laws.

A case in point is a new technology brought about by the science of molecular biology. This new technology will most definitely change civilization as fundamentally as did the developments of electricity and internal combustion.

It will put powers of design and creation, once thought the sole domain of God, into the hands of high school students.

What is this most powerful and wondrous technology?

Meet CRISPR-CAS9, a gene editing technology taken from a lowly bacteria called  Francisella novicida bacteria(2):

crispr_cas9-image

Simply, with the CRISPR-CAS9 technology (3):

  1.  All genetic diseases could be eliminated.
  2. Endless varieties and quantities of plant and animal food could be designed and created.
  3. Most industrial pollution could be eliminated.
  4. Most manufacturing could be switched from polluting and high resource-consuming traditional industrial chemical methods to molecular biological methods.
  5. Death from aging could be eliminated.

So where does the Christian worldview fit into this new technology?

The answer is obvious.

If the fires of creation could be put into the hands of high school students the possibility of unleashing total disaster upon all of mankind would be imminent.

Clearly, effective moral ethics must be applied to CRISPR-CAS9 technology before it is unleashed from research laboratories into civilization at large.

The Great Genocide of the Unborn (the abortion industry) and the subsequent harvesting and selling of butchered baby body parts is but one example of the catastrophic failure of atheist ethics.

Other catastrophic failures of atheist ethics include Marxist economics and Marxist political systems.  Atheist ethics fails because it takes everything wrong with any social system (economic or political), puts them on steroids and then gives ruthless people with those amped up faults total power over everyone and everything.

Global warming and ObamaCare are two examples of atheist ethics leading to catastrophic social failure since both provide platforms based on hoaxes that give total power to a ruthless, ruling elite.

Heaven won’t come to all of mankind until Jesus comes again.

But getting rid of atheism and reestablishing a dominant Christian culture in the West would surely usher in a far better world for us all.

Work cited:

  1. The Declaration of Independence
  2. CRISPR, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CRISPR
  3. CRISPR’s Most Exciting Uses Have Nothing to Do With Gene Editing, http://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/01/the-most-exciting-uses-of-gene-editing-technology-involve-no-editing/422619/