Introducing Natural Law Theory for the Common Man

Unfortunately, with the dramatic collapse of Christianity in the West, natural law theory has been almost totally forgotten and is considered an exotic anachronism by the West’s new and dominating atheist intelligentsia.

And most Christians, both Catholic and Protestant have been absorbing and living out the atheist worldview for nearly a century!  And to them, like any atheist, natural law theory is seen as dangerous; and as distant as the Greek culture from which it originated.

Until modern times, natural law theory was the staple brain food for the Christian people of Western Civilization. Though Greek in origin, it aligned perfectly with the Christian faith.

Saint John and Saint Paul used the Greek mode of thinking and writing to spread Christianity throughout what would become the Eastern Roman Empire.  In fact, the first sentence of the Saint John Gospel is a pyrotechnic display of the teachings of Jesus expressed in Platonist fashion:

“In the beginning was the Word.  The Word was with God.  The Word was God.”

Those three short, Greek sentences articulate the theology of the Apostle’s Creed which encapsulates the essence of the Christian faith in a single prayer.

In posts that immediately follow this one, natural law theory will be demonstrated as an intellectual tool for determining what leads to objective good in ethics and morals, politics and economics.

But what is natural law theory?

ethical-theories-nursing-ethics-40-638

Natural law theory is based on the premise that nothing happens all by itself and that what does happen (everything that is) is based on comprehensible and ordered principles (laws).

Consequently, if we can understand the nature of a particular thing we can understand the actual, objective, universal truth about that thing.

Natural law theory is then, a way of filtering out the personal bias that for time immemorial has blinded mankind and made peace and harmony an absolute impossibility.

 

16 responses to “Introducing Natural Law Theory for the Common Man”

  1. “(N)atural law theory has been almost totally forgotten and is considered an exotic anachronism by the West’s new and dominating atheist intelligentsia. And most Christians, both Catholic and Protestant have been absorbing and living out the atheist worldview for nearly a century! And to them, like any atheist, natural law theory is seen as dangerous;”

    Ah yes, the dominating atheist intelligentsia… which reminds me, my biannual fees to them is almost due. I mean, seriously, if we in the dominating intelligentsia (and I’ve got the membership card to prove it) didn’t suppress such a dangerous idea as natural law and let it loose upon the world, we might return to the glory years of 1400s where everybody thrived under the Church’s tutelage and were just so happy and prosperous.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. tildeb,

      Throughout the history of civilization, ideas have tended to flow from the top downward.

      During modern times we have seen the rise of Communism, Progressivism, fascism, begin with intellectuals and get swallowed hook, line and sinker in the universities.

      And then those ideas filtered out into the mass media, literature and finally to the mainstream culture.

      Communism, Progressivism and fascism are bold, unequivocal repudiations of natural law theory and thus, Christianity and Western Civilization.

      Like

  2. The theory of Natural Law – Aquinas’ version, anyway – is a circular bubble of creationist thought (used to justify fundamental yet incompatible religious dogmas) out of which no new knowledge about reality ever emerges. No surprise there, yet this is how it is used by its supporters. The confusion with its use as a method to approach understanding anything to do with reality lies in the fact that this so-called ‘theory’ is really nothing more than a logical yet knowledge-empty compilation of claims which is then used to produce more claims imposed on reality and then treated as if true. It’s products demonstrate its truth value through usefulness: different areas of ignorance differing only in the vastness of ignorance presented.

    That’s why it has been replaced in the inquiry into reality by methodological naturalism… a methodological approach that does produce knowledge about reality… knowledge in the form of explanatory models we can then apply in technologies, therapies, and applications that seem to work for everyone everywhere all the time. This is not a trivial difference in approaches.

    Natural Law is a useful tool fundamental to applying the veneer of sophistication to vague and ill-defined and nebulous notions that can avoid testing. That’s why we find it still alive in metaphysics, theology, and New Age woo… areas whose supporters refuse to let their ‘explanations’ that appear to be logically deduced be subject to reality’s arbitration of them but insist the logical form alone is sufficient.

    This is a fatal mistake in methodology.

    In short yet accurate summation, we can best define the Theory of Natural Law by the maxim Garbage In, Garbage Out. That’s what this method called Natural Law produces and is hardly worth respecting.

    Like

    1. tildeb,

      Aquinas incorporated Aristotelian natural law and systematic thinking into Christian divine law.

      For example, Aristotle simply could not bring himself to use his natural law theory to explain why slavery was evil even though it is pretty obvious.

      That was because slavery was such an ingrained and seemingly natural institution.

      Christian divine law subtracted the human bias out of natural law theory so that a true and universal ethics could be developed.

      The Founding Fathers used natural law theory to design and build the American Republic and Abraham Lincoln used it to argue that slavery was indeed evil.

      Like

  3. Som,
    And slavery was a big no no in God’s mind for the whole of the ot?

    Liked by 1 person

    1. KIA,

      The two greatest events of the Bible are God freeing the Hebrews from slavery to Pharaoh and Jesus freeing mankind from the slavery to sin.

      Slavery is an evil of man, not God.

      Like

      1. Aside from the fact neither of those are actually historical, you don’t seem to have read the part where the biblical God gives the fictional Moses instructions for regulating slavery and who can be enslaved.

        Liked by 1 person

        1. KIA,

          If neither the Old Testament nor the New Testament are historical than the claim that God condones slavery is obviously false.

          Also, regulations are a way of making something better or forcing something out of existence altogether.

          Consequently, your claim that God is somehow evil for regulating a human evil is also false.

          Like

          1. You’re funny

            Like

  4. So many people simply don’t think well. This was a refreshing post.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks for dropping by, Robert.

      Liked by 1 person

  5. Good post! If we measure your post against the irritation of certain detractors, then it must be excellent.
    😀

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Citizen,

      As our civilization collapses it is up to those who understand what makes civilization happen, to model the modes of thought that do, in fact make civilization happen.

      Progressivism, socialism and the entire postmodern worldview are taking us back to a future of mass death, mass poverty and pitiless tyranny.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Yes, just so. And the stats back this up… oh… wait…umm…

        Liked by 1 person

        1. tildeb,

          Statistics, like words can tell you anything you want to hear especially if you water board them.

          Liked by 2 people

  6. Excellent and important post Silence! It’s true what you say, one only needs to open their eyes and look at the world to see it.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment