Biblical Wisdom for Dummies (and other atheist subcultures)

The great literary works of Antiquity such as the Bible, Homer’s Iliad and Odyssey and Plato’s Republic do a stupendous job illuminating the deep dark fissures and chasms in the human nature each of us struggle with day by day, year by year, decade by decade.

For example, today my atheist-feminist food-loving supervisor issued forth with not so constructive criticism that at first blush would have seemed obscenely cruel and sadistic.

What could I do in such a horribly demeaning situation but quote Aristotle (I think she would have hit me if I had quoted Saint Paul)?

Quoth I, “I am convinced that you are not evil but good.  That is, what you do here is aimed at some good end (Aristotle’s Ethics, page 1).”

“But I do possess human nature and being made to feel like an idiot does not improve my performance but wounds me deeply.”

Yes, that was me, at once back talking my boss, proclaiming my humanity in the face of ruthless oppression, and being ever so polite about it all.

Not surprisingly, I was reminded of the famous biblical story from Genesis about Adam and Eve and eating fruit from the Tree of Good and  Evil.

Adam & Eve

Here, from Genesis 2:16-17:

“And this was the command which the Lord God gave the man, Thou mayest eat thy fill of all the trees in the garden except the tree which brings knowledge of good and evil; if ever thou eatest of this, thy doom is death (Genesis 2:16-17).”

I have become convinced that understanding that one single passage is the key to my happiness.

Why?

Because the knowledge of good and evil brings with it the absolute need to impose justice for the good and evil that is done around us all day, every day, for our entire life.

Knowledge of good and evil requires that I judge and condemn my neighbor and everything in world that commits evil, all day, every day, for my entire life.

Keep an eye on yourself sometime and see how much score keeping goes on inside your heart and mind, all day, every day.

Justice then becomes the advantage of the strong (Thrasymachus’ definition of justice, Plato’s Republic).

And the world becomes what it has been since time immemorial: a horror show of murder, oppression, poverty, vice and hopelessness.

And such a hell on Earth is the world of atheism where each individual understands good and evil in his own way and stands in everlasting judgement of his neighbor.

So what is the answer to this conundrum of the knowledge of good and evil?

History has shown us that Christianity has provided this answer to mankind.

44 responses to “Biblical Wisdom for Dummies (and other atheist subcultures)”

  1. So are you saying the ability to judge right from wrong, good from evil is ‘hell on earth’?
    Justice is not a worthy and honorable goal in life (Micah 6:8)

    Liked by 1 person

    1. KIA,

      Thanks for dropping by.

      If a man has knowledge of good and evil, what makes his knowledge any more worthy than the knowledge of good and evil possessed by another?

      By eating the fruit of the tree of good and evil, good and evil were reduced to mere personal opinion.

      This is because eating the fruit of that tree is a rejection of God who is above man and thus provides mankind with objective or true knowledge of good and evil.

      Like

      1. So was the fruit of that tree also created by God and was tree placed in the garden ‘facilitating’ their disobedience by its proximity and gods absence?

        Like

        1. KIA,

          Such speculation misses the point of the story.

          Like

          1. You tell me I’M speculating? Read your own words again.

            Like

            1. KIA,

              The true meaning of the story is not speculating.

              A central problem with the written word is that it is subject to interpretation.

              We must be careful to keep to the original meaning of the story.

              Like

            2. Do you have some other medium of conveyance than the written word to guide your interpretation?

              Like

            3. KIA,

              The point I am making is that to avoid errors in interpretation, one must understand what the author is trying to say.

              Like

            4. No other way than to read and understand what the author is actually saying, not some ‘true meaning’ that is apart from the written word, you deny it to be interpretation but that’s exactly what it is.

              Like

            5. KIA,

              The Bible is a Christian tome compiled by the Catholic Church.

              It is the Catholic Church who has the authority to teach what the Bible means.

              Consequently, I am not offering my own opinion or interpretation here.

              Like

            6. Christian tome? LOL

              Like

            7. KIA,

              Laughing out loud at a true statement exposes the utter depravity of atheism and proves exactly what I have written here this post.

              Like

            8. Nice response. So have you ever wondered why god placed the serpent, very good by the way Gen 1 31 again, in the garden to tempt Adam and eve?

              Like

            9. KIA,

              Ancient writers, especially those who wrote many of the stories in the Bible set up situations in order to make a point.

              Unfortunately, the atheist insists on missing the point even when it is explained is the simplest of terms.

              Like

            10. All things in the garden, good according to Gen 1 31 by the way, we’re created by and placed there with purpose by god. He facilitated the deception. Of and disobedience of Adam and eve.

              Like

          2. If God allowed their choice, and facilitated it thru the provision of the tree, then he was encouraging their free determination, even though they chose against. That doesn’t sound like god didn’t want them to use their own judgment

            Like

            1. KIA,

              “Facilitate” is your word derived from your own interpretation of the story.

              Try reading the story for the meaning the author intended which has to do with the nature of God and man.

              Like

            2. Do you know what the word facilitate means? It means to provide for, make possible.

              Like

            3. KIA,

              So? Facilitate has nothing whatsoever to do with the story.

              Like

            4. Now you aren’t thinking clearly.

              Like

            5. KIA,

              Not thinking like you is not thinking clearly.

              You are trying to invent meaning where there is none in order to make your atheism work out for you.

              That type of erroneous thinking is called constructivism and it has been taught in the public schools for decades.

              You’ve basically been brainwashed into believing that whatever you think is true simply because you think it.

              Like

            6. Sorry but I’m out of time tonight for banter. Sleep well

              Like

      2. Wasn’t he calling for them to make an informed but free determination for themselves?

        Like

        1. KIA,

          Yes. We are free to accept or reject God.

          But the great stories of Antiquity tell tales of hubris and the utter disaster that springs forth from man even when his intentions are good.

          Like

          1. It wasn’t god they were being called to accept or reject. They didn’t reject god in the story. Your thinking is off

            Like

      3. Though they made the choice that was in disagreement with god, god still ‘valued’ their free and independent determination.

        Like

        1. KIA,

          Yes, freewill is certainly a central theme in the teachings of Christianity.

          Like

          1. That’s a different topic, but I’ll bite… is it a free choice if you are threatened with death for the ‘wrong’ choice of two?

            Like

            1. KIA,

              Being informed of the consequences of a choice, does not take away freedom of choice.

              Informed choice is wisdom.

              Like

            2. Informed choice is using wisdom. The choice itself is judgment of right and wrong for themselves

              Like

            3. KIA,

              Informed choice is only wisdom if one heeds the information.

              Adam and Eve were informed but made the wrong choice.

              Like

  2. I meant to end with a ? Not a statement

    Like

  3. KIA,

    God told Adam and Eve not to eat the fruit from the tree of good and evil.

    Acting contrary to the will of God is the same as rejecting him.

    Like

  4. Well said, Silence.

    Adam and Eve did not really know they were doing evil, they had no knowledge of good and evil before they ate the fruit. They were deceived into believing what they were doing was okay. After the serpent tricks her we read “..when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise..” Alas, perception is not always reality. Those same deceptions exist in the world today, so we often think what we are doing is good, when it is in fact, not good at all. The lesson in there should be obey God because God is God and He knows things we do not. The error there is always going to be on our end.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. You’ve really brought up another great teaching in this story:

      Without God, man is a very foolish and gullible being.

      This story puts atheism in its true, tragic light.

      Liked by 1 person

  5. This entire article and the comments after it, smacks of intellectual masturbation. You’re reading too much into the biblical stories. For one thing, there is no absolute of good and evil, as any of the injunctions of the biblical “God” would have you think.

    Let’s take “Honour thy parents”. An injunction that must always be followed? Even if your parents absued you, raped you?

    “A teenager kills her father”. An act of good or evil? You can’t say without the details. The same with the statement “A man kills another man”.

    A considered atheist spirit brings with it not a judgemental and arrogant view of the world and other’s rights or wrongs; it comes with the realization that everyone’s story is unique and that “good vs evil” is not so easy to tell apart.

    Like

    1. Rajeev,

      The entire Bible is about God as the source of absolute truth.

      In the Old Testament, God gave the Law to the Jews.

      In the New Testament, Jesus became the Law to mankind.

      Like

      1. In other words, you have nothing valuable to add. Amen.

        Like

        1. Rajeev,

          There are no other words but my own.

          The Bible is what it is and says what it says.

          That means what you are claiming is provably false.

          Like

  6. Not one of your finer posts SOM. What silly thing did you do at work?

    Like

    1. Violet,

      Actually, this is one of my best posts.

      It relies on the vast treasure trove of wisdom presented to mankind by our Western Heritage and delivers a round house, knockout blow to atheism.

      So naturally, atheists would howl protest in their usual irrational, insulting manner.

      Liked by 2 people

      1. Perhaps I didn’t read it correctly in that case. But what silly thing did you do at work that provoked the rebuke that inspired such a fine cascade of thinking?

        Like

  7. So, if IB is correct and they didn’t know they were doing evil, would they still be culpable? And if god punished them and all humanity for what they didn’t know was evil, isn’t he injust?

    Like

  8. By the way, IB is not correct in the interpretation

    Like

Leave a comment