Why Brother Mario of Buenos Aires Is the Worst Pope EVER!

At the end of the Christian Middle Ages, it was papal idolatry, the prolonged and profoundly ingrained love and pursuit of wealth and secular power that disillusioned Catholic scholar and priest, Martin Luther, exploded into a megaton fusion blast called, The Protestant Reformation.

Europe was never the same and the once almost unified religion of Catholic Christianity was forever shattered to bits. The Protestant Reformation was European Christendom’s profound, intractable denial of Jesus’ passionate and poetic divine call for unity among his people.

And today, the Christian world (i.e., Western Civilization) is being torn asunder by another idolater: none other than Pope Francis (nee Mario Bergoglio), Bishop of Rome.


What makes Pope Francis an idolater?

Pope Francis is a radical leftist.

That means his true religion is radical leftist political philosophy, not the Gospel teachings of Jesus Christ.

And that means that Pope Francis has no regard whatsoever for objective reality and “the Laws of Nature and Nature’s God,” which form the bedrock of the Christian worldview.

Here are a few examples taken from his latest letter that demonstrate the rotten black corruption of Pope Frances:

  1. “I know that you have committed yourselves to fight for social justice, to defend our Sister Mother Earth and to stand alongside migrants.”

“Sister Mother Earth” harkens a return to pagan religions.

And “social justice” is left code for totalitarian state control over every aspect of society.

2. “First, the ecological crisis is real. “A very solid scientific consensus indicates that we are presently witnessing a disturbing warming of the climatic system.”

Global warming is a proven hoax and there is no such thing as “scientific consensus.”

Pope Francis is thus, a liar.

And like any leftist who is intelligent enough, patient enough and ruthless enough to acquire a position of power, Pope Francis knows that he is lying.

3. “Christian terrorism does not exist, Jewish terrorism does not exist, and Muslim terrorism does not exist. There are fundamentalist and violent individuals in all peoples and religions.”

In this truly evil statement, Pope Francis not only willfully lies but he uses the time honored leftist tactic called moral equivalence to deny the existence of the Islamic Jihad.

The fact is that the Islamic Jihad is the perennial enemy of Christian Western Civilization and has been trying to destroy it since the Jihad stormed out of Arabia in the 7th century Anno Domini.

But there is one thing Pope Francis said in his latest letter that I can get behind:

“Where there is error, let us sow truth.”

Pope Francis through his in-your-face lying and brazen idolatry, has untethered Western Civilization from reality: the Gospel teachings of Jesus and the exceptional civilization that they spawned.

Nevertheless, I would like to introduce modern humanity to today’s Martin Luther:


Donald Trump, long may you run.




Christianity – Modern Civilization’s Critical Ingredient

America is truly God’s Country.

Humble servant of Christ, Silence of Mind, once drew the ire of his Catholic pastor by seriously recommending that the Holy See be moved to Topeka, Kansas, the near geographic center of God’s Country, the United States of America.


But once Good Pastor Jim took a moment to get over his ingrained and trained Catholic reverence for tradition, he was able to see clearly into the Silence of Mind:

“In giving freedom to the slave, we assure freedom to the free — honorable alike in what we give, and what we preserve. We shall nobly save, or meanly lose, the last best hope of earth.”

Those are the golden words of Abraham Lincoln after the onset of the American Civil War.

In the centuries of late Antiquity, Christianity rose from a gutter Palestinian religious cult to the cultural and religious coin of the realm of the entire Greco-Roman expanse (Europe, North Africa, Middle East, Asia Minor, Britain).

Rome became the capital of the western area of the Christian expanse and Byzantium (Constantinople) became the capital of the eastern area of the new Christian expanse.

Ironically, Christian eastern expanse retained its Greco-Roman imperial government until 1453 when it was finally conquered and wiped out by the Islamic Jihad.

The foundation for modernity, what the world calls Western Civilization, was laid down in the Christian western expanse (Europe and Britain) during the Middle Ages. The Catholic Church became one of the most powerful institutions in the world, having inserted itself into the secular-political machinery of the decaying and doomed Greco-Roman culture.

Of particular note is that with the Church and various secular power centers constantly competing with and checking each other, liberty was able to break out in Europe.

The Reformation, the Italian Renaissance and the Age of Discovery all heralded the advent of modernity.


Such blazing social phenomena (all powered by Christianity) never, ever happened in any other civilizations throughout human history.

And this is precisely why Christian Western Civilization is the only civilization in human history that was able to advance past the slave and the beast of burden.

Christian philosophers gave us modern science, capitalism, authentic human rights and stable republican government.

It is therefore critically necessary for the people of today to relish the resurgence of Christianity in the American Republic.  This is because the common sense, morality and intellectual vitality infused into culture by Christians, makes modern culture possible.

Unlike Good Pastor Jim, the grand multitude of teaming humanity will never have the opportunity and marvelous fortune to gaze into the Silence of Mind for insight into the mechanics of American civilization and culture.

The next best thing is to watch THE Donald as he goes about establishing and running his presidency.


Dialoguing of the Transgender and Pro-Abortion Arguments to Find the Truth

The dialogue presented here, between a transgender leftist and a man educated in natural theory and modern science, is as rare as hen’s teeth.

Leftists usually explode into psychotic rage when their ideas and arguments are questioned.

But not in this case.

Both sides of the arguments presented here are prodded and probed and tickled by the respective protagonists.

Whatever side of the argument you take, do you see any points that were missed or poorly presented by the two men?

Regrettably, the title of the video is a bit aggressive but don’t be discouraged.

For your viewing pleasure, an argument between two diametrically opposing views,  fashioned like an art piece:



NOAA Scientist Blows Whistle On Global Warming Hoax

“A high-level whistleblower has told this newspaper that America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) breached its own rules on scientific integrity when it published the sensational but flawed report, aimed at making the maximum possible impact on world leaders including Barack Obama and David Cameron at the UN climate conference in Paris in 2015.”


The UN and NOAA hoaxers tried to use the UN climate report to make a nearly 20 year period of stable weather disappear.

“The report claimed that the ‘pause’ or ‘slowdown’ in global warming in the period since 1998 – revealed by UN scientists in 2013 – never existed, and that world temperatures had been rising faster than scientists expected.”

What is truly strange and of great concern is how many seemingly intelligent people swallow government hoaxes so easily and so totally.

US Catholic Bishops Publically Shame President Trump Today At Church

A contents of a letter from the US Catholic Bishops was deep throated into the gullets of the Catholic laity today at church.  In the letter, US Catholic Bishops shamed President Trump and his supporters for his executive order which seeks to delay refugee and immigrant admission into the United States.


Here are the contents of the letter:

“We strongly disagree with the Executive Order’s halting refugee admissions. We believe that now more than ever, welcoming newcomers and refugees is an act of love and hope. We will continue to engage the new administration, as we have all administrations for the duration of the current refugee program, now almost forty years. We will work vigorously to ensure that refugees are humanely welcomed in collaboration with Catholic Charities without sacrificing our security or our core values as Americans, and to ensure that families may be reunified with their loved ones.”

“The United States has long provided leadership in resettling refugees. We believe in assisting all those who are vulnerable and fleeing persecution, regardless of their religion. This includes Christians, as well as Yazidis and Shia Muslims from Syria, Rohingyas from Burma, and other religious minorities. However, we need to protect all our brothers and sisters of all faiths, including Muslims, who have lost family, home, and country. They are children of God and are entitled to be treated with human dignity. We believe that by helping to resettle the most vulnerable, we are living out our Christian faith as Jesus has challenged us to do.”

“Today, more than 65 million people around the world are forcibly displaced from their homes. Given this extraordinary level of suffering, the U.S. Catholic Bishops will redouble their support for, and efforts to protect, all who flee persecution and violence, as just one part of the perennial and global work of the Church in this area of concern.”

President Trump’s executive order is for a delay of 120 days, not a “halting” of refugee admissions.

That Catholic Bishops feel they have to not only interfere with the policies of a duly elected US President, but to outright lie about his intentions is beyond stunning.

Most of the people at my church voted for President Trump and after the letter was read there was nothing but stone cold, bitter silence.

Trump Immigration Ban a Lesson in Divided Government

Today, news headlines read something like, “Federal Court Halts Trump’s Immigration Ban,” or “Judges Block Parts of Trump’s Order of Muslim Immigration.”

Here we have a very public conflict between Trump’s executive branch of government and the unaccountable judicial branch of government which for the last century has been allowed to run hog wild.

President Trump issues an order executing immigration law and a judge jumps in on behalf of those immigrants affected by the executive order, effectively acting as a check on executive power.


What is THE Donald to do?

First, let’s review a little basic political science brought to American government by its Founding Fathers who, regarding the separation of powers, were the brain children of Enlightenment political philosopher, Charles de Montesquieu (a Frenchie of all things!).

America’s Founding Fathers via the Constitution, designed and built a government whose powers to govern were institutionally separated into their constituent parts:

  1. The power to create rules (legislative branch)
  2. The power to enforce the rules (executive branch)
  3. The power to interpret the rules (judicial branch)

The powers of government were separated to allow people to be free of government tyranny so that The People could govern themselves and become masters of their own lives.

The relevant situation is that President Trump has enforced rules created by Congress (the legislative branch); and a judge (a member of the judicial branch) has stepped in on behalf of those affected by the enforcement of those rules. The judge’s objective: to check the enforcement and rule making powers of the executive and legislative branches of government.

But President Trump responded to the judicial branch check by simply ignoring it. This is a rare example of the executive branch turning right around and counter-checking judicial branch power.


So what happens now?

President Trump, the leader of the executive branch was duly elected by The People and is accountable to them.

The judicial branch was established specifically NOT to be subject to the will of The People so as to be a truly independent source of legal judgment.

So that leaves The People as the check on President Trump with his decision to ignore a judge’s order.

So the question is, in this situation, which branch of government is acting in accordance with the rule of law?

The answer may not be obvious.


National Unity Lost In Translation

The following is a foreign language dictionary of common terms for Americans visiting or living in, the Clinton Archipelago.*


1) “Peaceful Protest” – No leftists were hurt while throwing bricks through windows, demanding “Death to the pigs” or getting together in large gangs to waylay small, lone counter protesters from behind.

2) “Voter Suppression” — Cutting into Democrat vote totals by taking any steps to prevent voter fraud like requiring a photo ID at the polling place.

3) “The Constitution” – An outdated, irrelevant document that should be ignored unless you are claiming that some liberal agenda item is guaranteed by it despite the fact that no one noticed it for 200 years.

4) “Fascist” — People who want to cut spending, abide by the Constitution and get the government off your back.

5) “We want the government out of our bedrooms” – We want the government out of our bedrooms…right after they force the Pope to buy us birth control and promise to support our children if we decide not to use the IUD suggested by the Pope because, “Who does that guy think he is, right?”

6) “Greedy” — People who want to keep money they’ve earned instead of giving it to people who don’t work as hard, but do vote for Democrats.

7) “Sexism” – Disagreeing with Hillary Clinton, opposing the abortion of female babies or being against mentally ill men being allowed to use the bathroom with women.

8) “Radical position” – Relatively popular non-liberal positions that have been around as long as anyone can remember — that liberals have recently decided to oppose almost entirely to make themselves appear more sensitive. Example: Refusing to change the name of the Redskins or believing you can’t change genders via surgery is a radical position.

9) “Angry, white male” – A white guy who votes Republican.

10) “Anti-intellectual” – Those who refuse to acknowledge that liberal college professors who couldn’t cut it outside of a university or MSNBC are right about everything.

11) “Racist” — Those who believe that people should be judged by the content of their character, not the color of their skin and those who believe in enforcing the immigration laws that are already on the books.

12) “Climate change denier” — Someone who actually judges global warming based on the available scientific evidence instead of coming up with a socialistic agenda first and then passing out grant money to any scientists who are willing to attempt to justify it.

13) “Bipartisanship” – When Republicans cooperate with Democrats to push their radical leftist agenda. Not to be confused with “selling out” which happens when Democrats cooperate with Republicans to push their agenda.

14) “Heartless” – Supporting programs based on whether they work and are good for the country instead of selecting programs to back based on how good they make you feel about yourself.

15) “Open Minded” – Mindlessly agreeing with Nancy Pelosi and Michael Moore 100% on every issue.

16) “A Courageous Speech” — When one leftist gives a self-congratulatory speech to another group of leftists that restates things they all believe.

17) “The American Flag” — A symbol of oppression waved by ignorant, bucktoothed hillbillies dumb enough to think that this is a great place to live.

18) “Guns” — The cause of all crime.

19) “Jesus” — Someone who is completely irrelevant to any and all political matters unless you’re claiming He would definitely support gay marriage or abortion.

20) “Hands up, don’t shoot” –The police shouldn’t be allowed to shoot people with their hands up or people pointing toy guns at them or people trying to kill them or pretty much anybody, for any reason.

*Hawks, John. Liberal Translation Guide: 20 Translations of Things Liberals Say. http://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2017/01/21/the-liberal-translation-guide-20-translations-of-things-that-liberals-say-n2274756

Why Atheism Is So Deadly to the Individual and to Society

Atheism is so deadly to the individual because it strands him in time and head space.

Atheism is so deadly to society because an atheist society is composed by people who are stranded in time and head space.

Credit for the particular philosophical malady affecting atheists goes to none other than good Friar William of Ockham (born around 1280 Anno Domini in Ockham, England). He was a Catholic priest and heretic who is famous in modern times as the author of “Ockham’s Razor.”


Friar William Ockham’s teachings were so radical that he was finally forced to go on the lam to escape Catholic Church Inquisitors. He is thought to have died in Munich, Germany circa 1349 Anno Domini.

Were he alive today, Friar William of Ockham might be known as a “constructivist.” That is, what we learn does not come from developing an understanding of objective reality, but from what we conceptually construct about our own experiences in our own minds.

In other words, reality and what we think we know is whatever we define it to be. What’s wrong with this picture?

alfred-e-headroomThe constructed individual has his own personal Max Headroom for a mind, a non-stop, chattering of unadulterated bias.

Just think of it!

The constructed individual hasn’t a snow ball’s chance in hell of escaping a destiny guided by pure stupidity.  For stupidity is the natural state of man. Unlike all other creatures, man has to be taught everything. How can a creature whose natural state is stupidity, teach himself anything?

Further, stupidity, always at odds with objective reality, makes happiness impossible.

Just think of it!

These particular teachings of Friar William of Ockham are the accepted doctrine in today’s educational, political and media establishments. Ironically, our entire, nearly Godless, Western society sits on the shoulders of a Medieval Catholic heretic priest.

In the classroom, students are left to find their own way which leaves them sitting ducks for indoctrination.

In politics, The People, bereft of any understanding of “the Laws of Nature and Nature’s God,” are left intellectually disarmed. For they have nothing but their own personal bias to aid them in making sense of relentless, emotionally violent and confusing political campaigns.

And the media, far from informing the public and fostering human nature, becomes a vicious, remorseless tool of totalitarian statecraft.

In conclusion, we can reason out that atheism is deadly to the individual.

This is because the atheism provides the intellect with no objective foundation upon which to stand. It is therefore necessary for the individual to construct his own version of reality within his own solitary mind.

This leaves the human being in his natural state of stupidity. For all he knows is what little he was able to construct in his own mind, or what was fed to him by those who “taught” him. This  also means that personal bias is left to run amok since the power to think rationally was never developed.

More disturbing still is that the institutions fundamental to civil society, education, political and media, are all dedicated to the mass production of stupid people.

It is long past time to throw atheism and the teachings of Friar William of Ockham  onto the ash heap of history.




The Official, Infallible “All Atheists Are Marxists” Test

From cold, hard experience on social media it appears that atheists invariably are hard core Marxists (leftists).

Presented here is the Official, Infallible All Atheists are Marxists Test:

  1. Do you dislike or even hate Donald Trump?
  2. In the picture below what is Donald Trump saying?


Answer Key:

  1. If you are an atheist and answered “Yes” to question #1, the Official, Infallible “All Atheists are Marxists” Test has determined that you are a Marxist.
  2. Don’t answer that question, you potty mouthed Marxist!